DS/ISO Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results – Part 4: Basic methods for estimating the trueness of a standard. ISO Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results – Part 4: Basic Methods for the Determination of the Trueness of a. Buy DS ISO ACCURACY (TRUENESS AND PRECISION) OF MEASUREMENT METHODS AND RESULTS – PART 4: BASIC METHODS FOR.
|Published (Last):||18 January 2012|
|PDF File Size:||20.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Accuracy trueness and precision of measurement methods and results — Part 2: Annexes 7525-4, C and D are for information only. Further regular testing is required to show that the labora- tory bias does not vary; the method described in IS0 may be used for this. Related international standards ISO IS0 l should be read in conjunction with all other parts of IS0including this part, because it gives the underlying definitions and general principles.
First Balkan IT Conference for business platform for standardization In the latter case, a careful examination of the working conditions of each laboratory shall be 5752-4 out before the assessment of the bias of the standard measurement method is undertaken.
Enoval – References
Accuracy trueness and precision of measurement methods and results — Part 5: In the former case, the repeatability standard devi- ation of the measurement method, or, will be used for the assessment of the laboratory bias.
In the latter case, it is necessary to investigate the causes of the discrep- ancy and possibly to repeat the experiment jso to proceeding further. In the former case, the repeatability standard devi- ation, gr, and the reproducibility standard deviation, gR, will be used for the assessment of the trueness of the measurement method. The analysis was performed such that in the case where the absence of between-bottle variation is confirmed, the four analytical results can be con- sidered as replicates under repeatability conditions.
Analysis of the results showed that the between- bottle variation was indeed insignificant; iao sample was considered to be homogeneous. What action should be taken with respect to re- jected outlying laboratories?
The number of laboratories to be used is discussed in subclause 6. Each laboratory re- ceived two randomly selected bottles of test sample for each level and performed duplicate analyses on each bottle. Your basket is empty. The repeatability and the reproducibility standard de- viations were then computed excluding those data that were discarded.
If the bias is found to be statistically insignif- icant, then the objective is to determine the magnitude of the maximum bias that would, with a certain probability, remain undetected by the results of the experiment. About Us Info center Standardization.
The laboratory means and vari- ances for each of the five test materials are listed in table 8. Learn more about the cookies we use and how to change your settings. Accuracy trueness and precision of measurement methods and results — Part 4: It was therefore decided to discard the results from laboratory 10 completely; it should be the object of special attention, and the matter should be resolved.
If the repeatability standard deviation, or, of the stan- dard measurement method is known, the estimate s, can be assessed by the following procedure. Worldwide Standards We can source any standard from anywhere in the world.
Outliers and stragglers Level Lab. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. The h values figureB. When a value for the bias of a measure- ment method is quoted, together with a test result obtained by that method, there is an implication that the same characteristic is being measured in exactly the same way.
Accuracy trueness and precision of measurement methods and results — Part 6: Exactitude justesse et fidelite des resultats et methodes de mesure.
This requires an experiment involving many laboratories, very much as described in IS0 The boxed points in figures B. Thus results from each laboratory can be considered as replicates under repeatability conditions.
Al- though, izo some measurement methods, the true value cannot be known exactly, it may be possible to have an accepted reference value for the property being measured; for example, if suitable reference materials are available, or if the accepted reference value can be established by refer- ence to another measurement method or by preparation of a known sample. A Awar G 1, There are three cases, ieo follows. Find Similar Items This product falls into the following categories.
In particular, if outlying values are de- tected, all necessary steps shall be taken to investi- gate the reasons why they have been obtained, including re-appraisal of the suitability of the accepted reference value. Grundlegendes Verfahren zur Schaetzung der Richtigkeit eines Messverfahrens.
FAQ What is standard Become a member? In the latter case, consideration should be given to repeating the experiment with verification at all steps that the standard measurement method is properly implemented.
There again, appropriate action should be taken by investigating these laboratories, or, 572-4 necessary, by tightening the protocol of the measurement method.
Search all products by. It may appear that some laboratories did not use the required equipment or did not work ac- cording to the specified conditions.