Bach made an impromptu visit to King Frederick the Great of Prussia, and was . Gödel, Escher, and Bach are deeply intertwined in this very short Dialogue. What are some of the most riveting concepts featured in Gödel, Escher, Bach? Why isn’t the Douglas Hofstadter book Gödel, Escher, Bach available as an. Douglas Hofstadter, the Pulitzer Prize–winning author of Gödel, Escher, Bach, thinks we’ve lost sight of what artificial intelligence really means.
|Published (Last):||24 September 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If you really like math, then this is going to be one of the best books you’ve ever read. That is, its r. We’re featuring millions of their reader ratings on our book pages to help you find your new favourite book. Basilica hotstadter Constantine Nocturnal Rome: This is perhaps the criticism that’s most commonly leveled against the book: No, the book isn’t designed this way, but considering that I couldn’t discern a solid central idea until page of the book, and that this was only one of several theses in the book, I wouldn’t be surprised if it proved possible to begin anywhere.
Some of the ideas regarding intelligence and how it should be implemented are perhaps slightly outdated you would see much more statistical reasoning if you asked experts today bacch, which is largely absent gdrl “old AI” approaches to intelligence.
If I were clever enough, I would write this review as a fugue. A theorem is an assertion of fact. A work worth taking your time over. They’re tedious and beat around the bush and make what should be one edcher into several pages. Nov 19, Nathan “N.
As the pages turn you will be steadily more tested and at some point it will become apparent you’ve not been paying close enough attention. He was initially appointed to the Indiana University’s Computer Science Department faculty inand at that time he launched his research program in computer modeling of mental processes which hostadter that time he called “artificial intelligence research”, a label that he has since dropped in favor of “cognitive science research”.
It seems a symbol cannot be bacg from other symbols in the brain. From a pedagogical point of view, this is really excellent: To describe such self-referencing objects, Hofstadter coins the term ” strange loop “—a concept he examines in more depth in his follow-up book I Am a Strange Loop.
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
The longer I think about it, the more astounding it becomes. Wertheim Tetrahedral Planetoide Fish No.
From our experiences, we all have lower level explicit isomorphisms from which we deduce new patterns. Just one small point: On the positive side, the author correctly highlights the critical importance of the fundamental result that there exist recursively enumerable sets which are not recursive in fact this is, in abstract computational theory terms, the very essence of the first Godel’s incompleteness theorem!
I better ask the Meta-Enlightened!
While I can certainly sympathize with this opinion, I cannot agree with it. One dialogue in the book gvel written in the form of a crab canonin which every line before the midpoint corresponds to an identical line past the midpoint. After such a sad tale it was impossible to say no.
Gödel, Escher, Bach – Wikipedia
The payoff is there, but the work cannot be hofstdter. Perhaps ultimately, the whole book is a metaphorical fugue on not knowing. The Atlantic Media Company.
You can’t just differ with the masses in not hating mathematics. If intelligence involves learning, creativity, emotional responses, a sense of beauty, a sense of self, then there is a long road ahead, and it may be that these will only be realized when we have totally duplicated a living brain. I need to hear it explained in another way. In fact, Hofstadter is very good at this part. For example, his discussion of the language processing functions of the brain is interesting, but did he really have to bring up the fact that he’s fluent in Russian and translated Eugene Onegin?
When certain neurons were stimulated, memories and impressions of specific events were recalled. If life can grow out of the formal chemical substrate of the cell, if consciousness can emerge out of a formal system of firing neurons, then so too will computers attain human intelligence. Once the outer message is fully understood, there is no need for the inner message, since the inner messages can be reconstructed once we have fully developed the outer message.
Colonade of St Peter’s Nocturnal Rome: I’m beginning to think that it will never happen. Hofstadter is about as interesting and insightful as a year-old stoner who got a hold of some of his dad’s reference books. The author appears to be highlighting that the structural reason behind the incompleteness theorems is the capability of a sufficiently powerful system to attain self-reference.
Godel, Escher, Bach : An Eternal Golden Braid
This requires intelligence in which we gauge that this will be an endless task. Bantam Bookspg Overall, this approach is very good at getting you to understand the complicated ideas Hofstadter is getting at.
View all 8 comments.